GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Wonder 1.0

2 posts14 likes2.4K views

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Wonder 1.0 in real side-by-side tests: 2 posts from X where both got the same prompt, with cost or time from every post. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

2

Same prompt, separate runs

1

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Summary

GPT-6.1 Sol and Muse Wonder 1.0 appear together in 2 posts on X: 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking (@melvynx) and battle of Waterloo voxel diorama (@ItsCuthulhu). All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @melvynx's 3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking, GPT-6.1 Sol was cheaper ($0.69 vs $1.70) and faster (18 min vs 21 min), as reported in the post. In @ItsCuthulhu's battle of Waterloo voxel diorama, Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster (9.1 min vs 21.8 min), as reported in the post.

What each post reports

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Muse Wonder 1.0: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensOriginal
3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynxMuse Wonder 1.021 min$1.70—X post
3D lava lamp, 4 models, max thinking@melvynxGPT-6.1 Sol18 min$0.69—X post
Battle of Waterloo voxel diorama@ItsCuthulhuMuse Wonder 1.09.1 min——X post
Battle of Waterloo voxel diorama@ItsCuthulhuGPT-6.1 Sol21.8 min——X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Prompts shown in the posts

build a 3D lava lamp — @melvynx
Build a moving 3D voxel diorama of the Battle of Waterloo with cannons firing and destroying buildings. — @ItsCuthulhu

Models

Related matchups