Matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

2 posts35 likes8.9K views

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 in real side-by-side tests: 2 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.

Posts

2

Same prompt, separate runs

4

Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.

Tokyo Tower in 3D

Claude Sonnet 5.5
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Summary

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 appear together in 2 posts on X: realistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts (@seki_anos) and booster caught by the launch tower (@adamshafizullah). 1 of them are part of larger lineups with other models. In @seki_anos's realistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($1.30 vs $6.79) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 was faster (1 h 10 min vs 3 h 40 min), as reported in the post.

What each post reports

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: cost, time and tokens as stated in each post
PostModelTimeCostTokensFeedback roundsOriginal
Realistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts@seki_anosDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10173 h 40 min$1.30—19X post
Realistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts@seki_anosClaude Sonnet 5.51 h 10 min$6.79—11X post
Booster caught by the launch tower@adamshafizullahDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017————X post
Booster caught by the launch tower@adamshafizullahClaude Sonnet 5.5————X post

Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.

Prompts shown in the posts

Build the Tokyo Tower in Three.js so it looks just like the real thing. (Translated from Japanese.) — @seki_anos

Models

Related matchups