DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Realistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts

SEKI | ANOS Inc. CEO@seki_anos

31 likes5,576 views

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 each build a lifelike Tokyo Tower in Three.js. The post lists fixes, time and cost: 19 fixes, 3 h 40 min, $1.30 against 11 fixes, 1 h 10 min, $6.79.

Models

ModelTimeCostNotes
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek3 h 40 min$1.3019 fixes; a reply breaks the cost into cache reads $0.66, output $0.40, input $0.24.
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic1 h 10 min$6.7911 fixes.Written as “Claude Sonnet 5.5”

Details

KindSide-by-side (same post, same prompt)
TaskRealistic Tokyo Tower, with fix counts
TopicTokyo Tower in 3D
Prompt (from the post)
Build the Tokyo Tower in Three.js so it looks just like the real thing. (Translated from Japanese.)
Category3D & Shaders
ModeMulti-turn
Posted
Video length15 s
Likes / views31 / 5,576 · as of Oct 18, 2026
Bookmarks4
NotesIn a reply the author says Claude Opus 5.5 acts as the planner while Sonnet 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does the execution; no harness is named.
SponsoredNo
Original postx.com/seki_anos/status/2111701818195714110

Related

Content belongs to its creators. Video by @seki_anos; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal

More with these models