Matchup
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
1 post39 likes5.4K views
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
1Same prompt, separate runs
1Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash appear together in 1 post on X: black hole lensing ray tracer, run locally (@WescheNex1q). In @WescheNex1q's black hole lensing ray tracer, run locally, GLM 5.3 Flash was faster (27 min vs 52 min) and used fewer tokens (86K tokens vs 115K tokens), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Feedback rounds | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black hole lensing ray tracer, run locally@WescheNex1q | GLM 5.3 Flash | 27 min | — | 86,000 | 1 | X post |
| Black hole lensing ray tracer, run locally@WescheNex1q | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 52 min | — | 115,000 | 1 | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Models
Related matchups
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.72 posts · 9.4K viewsGemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash2 posts · 1.7K viewsClaude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1 post · 63.4K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna1 post · 63.4K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash1 post · 18.1K viewsGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next1 post · 18.1K views