Matchup
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3
1 post2 likes306 views
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 in real side-by-side tests: 1 post from X where both got the same prompt; 1 post reports cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
Posts
1Same prompt, separate runs
1Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
Summary
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM 5.3 appear together in 1 post on X: same game, 4 models, no fixes (@wikiwayne). It is part of larger lineups with other models. In @wikiwayne's same game, 4 models, no fixes, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was cheaper ($0.0282 vs $0.0989) and GLM 5.3 was faster (4.1 min vs 5.5 min), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
| Post | Model | Time | Cost | Tokens | Original |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same game, 4 models, no fixes@wikiwayne | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 5.5 min | $0.0282 | — | X post |
| Same game, 4 models, no fixes@wikiwayne | GLM 5.3 | 4.1 min | $0.0989 | — | X post |
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Models
Related matchups
Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10178 posts · 191.6K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon5 posts · 104.5K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 Sol4 posts · 193.9K viewsClaude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.33 posts · 45.4K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10173 posts · 3.8K viewsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6 Astra2 posts · 79.7K views