AI Coding
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
Solving a scrambled Rubik’s cube
Scoreboard2
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Cost
- $0.20
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicAuthor’s pick
- Cost
- $0.81
Solving a scrambled Rubik’s cubeThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.
Opus actually solved it in 19 moves, while deepseek claimed success on a cube it had not solved.
@semichenkko’s view (paraphrased)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Claude Opus 5.5 must solve the same scrambled Rubik’s cube on camera. Opus solved it in 19 moves; DeepSeek’s own solver had a bug and "solved" a different cube.
The post, itemised
- Kind
- Side-by-side
- Task
- Solving a scrambled Rubik’s cube
- Category
- Simulations
- Mode
- Not stated
- Posted
- Video length
- 12 s
- Likes
- 14
- Views
- 493
- Bookmarks
- 9
- Sponsored
- No
Related
Content belongs to its creators. Video by @semichenkko; aivs.tv hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the original post on X. Request removal
